Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Huobi / HTX
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 14 → 14 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443506707
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-10T18:23:04.387Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 5ECHYJCn66aNKoUPFPcBGJjFYqEVVLXKA24AXjLoDzss
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1230 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-10T18:23:04.224Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"2ece5745-c331-49f2-8a6b-cbd578cfd4e5","new_score":14,"page_slug":"huobi-htx","prev_score":14,"reason":"The page's central claims — the May 26, 2026 UK sanctions designation, the Regulation 17A novelty, the $1.5B FCDO figure, the A7/Garantex network details, the TRM Labs and Global Ledger flow figures, the FCA financial-promotions proceedings, the SEC/Justin Sun case history, and the 2023 security incidents — were independently verified against primary and credible secondary sources and matched the page's characterization closely, in several cases down to exact dollar figures. Weaker points include a stale/superseded user-count figure sourced to a low-credibility review site, a mischaracterized cause for Grinex's April 2026 shutdown, a mismatched citation URL for the original 2022 Garantex OFAC designation, unverifiable specific dates for social-media platform compliance with FCA blocking requests, and a Proof-of-Reserves claim sourced only to a non-authoritative aggregator.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}