Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Mirror Protocol
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 49 → 49 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464381379
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T05:41:12.255Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T05:41:41.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T05:41:41.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- fLKwRQGvKbLaYJ1z1bvThrTWTxjXYXPU2CZRQRuhvc8
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1524 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"0ee23cbb385ec3ea015d0df11db1ae83","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:41:12.041Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1,"investigation_id":"36767d63-02f3-418a-8fb6-08dfde6c9594","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":49,"page_slug":"mirror","prev_score":49,"reason":"The core facts hold up: the roughly $90 million lock-contract exploit and May 14, 2022 silent patch (claim_findings[0]), the appeals ruling (claim_findings[4]), Do Kwon's 15-year sentence (claim_findings[9]) and the protocol's shutdown are all supported. With one claim excluded because its source blocked the reviewer, 1 of 10 claims (10%) could not be verified: the governance-attack figures (claim_findings[8]). Several smaller points need correction: the Band Protocol announcement and shutdown dates conflict across sources (claim_findings[5], [6]), the May 7, 2021 SEC start date is unconfirmed (claim_findings[2]), and the summary's statement that Terraform Labs 'orchestrated' the collapse overstates what Kwon was convicted of (claim_findings[10]). The review found no material omissions, and the page already says the protocol is shut down.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}