Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · CrediX Finance
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465111702
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-04T01:09:13.845Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-04T01:09:16.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-04T01:09:16.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9AZyHkPvTP5bpd5MsJ78dXqUoPgJQ6jkeGs4aMDUzCz3
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1250 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"d371d947ef4f43fc62a74a994206cbcd","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-04T01:09:13.624Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.4,"investigation_id":"294f90c2-a70f-4405-aedf-dd0bc7352bb5","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":0,"page_slug":"credix","prev_score":0,"reason":"Two of the five reviewed claims (claim_findings[1], the 09:10 UTC time, and claim_findings[2], the 630 ETH remaining in attacker wallets) could not be found in the sources the reviewer fetched, which puts the unverified share at 40%. No claim was disputed. The core account (five admin roles, unbacked mints, the team vanishing, Stability DAO's legal report) was confirmed (claim_findings[0], [4]), and the page's account of the shutdown matches the reviewer's status check. Because the unverified items are secondary details and the reviewer's confidence is limited, the penalty is set at the mild end of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}