Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Cega
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 68 → 68 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425211599
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T23:37:54.678Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Af3eU6bXNxutVU9KSWKgm1kBavH2nwZFpiciBoPP7qi5
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1245 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-08T23:37:54.557Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"5dc2a607-8031-498f-95d4-dd9fd7069a5d","new_score":68,"page_slug":"cega","prev_score":68,"reason":"The Cega investigation page is substantially accurate across its major factual claims. Funding rounds, investor rosters, audit history, the Alameda ISDA recovery, chain expansion dates, acquisition details, and regulatory status are all confirmed by independent sources. The principal weaknesses are: (1) the page describes '$10M TVL at peak' but evidence suggests the true peak was approximately $50M — the $10M figure appears to be a September 2024 near-sunset level, not a historical maximum; (2) the Forbes Japan 30 Under 30 claim for Toyosaki is unverifiable from available sources; (3) the page does not address whether any vaults triggered knock-in barrier breach events causing user principal losses, which is a material omission given the product risk section; (4) the Zellic audit report URL is effectively dead (HTTP 403). No claims were found to be actively disputed by a more credible source.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}