Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T22:07:00.953Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c19cb8ca-dd3d-45ae-b300-fa683a4915e4","new_score":0,"page_slug":"alex-larson-schultz-overhere-limited-hawk-memecoin","prev_score":4,"reason":"This page's disputed_pct is 20% (5 disputed + 3 unverifiable of 40 claims), squarely in the 10-30% band, and most of the page's factual scaffolding checks out against primary sources, including a complaint the reviewer fetched directly. Two findings carry more weight than their single-claim count suggests: the page cites the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as the basis for the lawsuit (claim_findings[23]) when the complaint's sole cause of action is under Sections 5 and 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 -- a real error about the legal exposure of a named, unconvicted individual, though it appears in two places on the page (a section body and a timeline entry), not four; neither the summary nor the section heading actually names a statute. Separately, a quote attributed to 'reporting by Mashable ... cited in the class action complaint' (claim_findings[6]) does not appear in the complaint at all -- per Bloomberg Law it is co-defendant OverHere's own statement shifting blame onto Schultz, so the page currently dresses up one defendant's unproven accusation as a complaint finding. The page also contradicts its own cited complaint twice by saying Clinton So's statements 'have not been widely reported' (claim_findings[36], [37]), when that complaint quotes him at length. A valuation-vs-amount-raised conflation (claim_findings[34]) and an internally inconsistent lede collapse statistic combining unreconciled source figures (claim_findings[0]) further erode confidence in the page's numeric precision, though neither rises to 'disputed' on its own. Given a moderate reviewer confidence (0.72) and a page that is mostly accurate but has two errors bearing directly on named individuals' legal exposure and evidentiary attribution, a mid-band revision penalty is warranted rather than denial or approval.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}