Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · James Wynn
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 18 → 18 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 422969545
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-29T15:54:27.572Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 8sqECZvXTkhZad6zZfRbEF3DRP8cX9wbFE9fUopB9YkD
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1166 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-29T15:54:27.495Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"694af3d0-71f3-4ce8-aaeb-e5c81c1b24c6","new_score":18,"page_slug":"james-wynn","prev_score":18,"reason":"The investigation page is broadly accurate on the core narrative — Wynn's high-leverage trading history, liquidation events, and memecoin controversy allegations are well-sourced across credible outlets. The most significant factual issue is a recurring mischaracterization of the Alameda Research transfer as '6,000 ETH' when the page's own cited sources describe it as 'around $6,000 in ETH' (a dollar-value figure), a distinction of potentially millions of dollars. A secondary concern is the claim of a CZ 'public endorsement,' which sources characterize as a casual social media reply rather than an endorsement. One Lookonchain citation is placed in a '2026' context when the post dates to June 2025, and the exact quote attributed to Wynn about 'effectively gambling' could not be independently verified verbatim.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}