Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464257983
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T22:20:34.812Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T22:21:02.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T22:21:02.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- AuA37PMDB2E1NEmgKQbLjrc7HeiedrEijkveZYB7cqkH
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1400 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"e186276d41509f215933acc26604aac6","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T22:20:34.736Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"AdnpLc9YDvAfAANfkthWd8j6LKRvQXkq33DfukEfsLPT","investigation_id":"de767707-c9cc-4b3a-a429-cb1b084df0cc","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"fcb8741c231642112b9c9fc3c49a31e5557429d4ccb8ae6ef9246b0492b69b9a","page_slug":"miloud-abderrahmane-isis-tron-facilitator-france","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core claims (designation date, legal basis, identity details, both TRON addresses, Chainalysis quote, Bitrace freeze details, co-designees) match OFAC, Treasury, Chainalysis and Bitrace. The page hedges vendor-sourced and uncorroborated detail appropriately and frames the explosives and crypto conduct as allegations. One minor nuance: the Treasury body names a fourth individual (Alhmidan, previously designated 2016) that the page omits. The Scorechain and July 2026 wallet claims were not independently fetched.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"sanctioned","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}