Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Flooring Protocol
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 35 → 35 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 459454488
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-21T01:59:23.857Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-21T01:59:52.365Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- HogEnQmMrxszNdC9Wxa45LhH6XpsMuFQ2L9WEYFYRt2f
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1797 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"3b75edef5af5ca7286a7956e972278c5","decided_at":"2026-10-21T01:59:23.721Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2632,"findings_hash":"3cC6spGr1sKQTLyGGe5y6mfjB1UsHXRgxYtWxFuBaJXi","investigation_id":"158de986-f23c-4454-b0cd-4a9341a72f09","mode":"findings_only","new_score":35,"page_content_hash":"ca4d006e1121a66e0ec83a0babbd145a1aa3cedd02eff5de7f847b4676e5c677","page_slug":"flooring-protocol","prev_score":35,"reason":"The page's central narrative — a pre-launch-audited NFT fractionalization protocol that suffered a December 2023 multicall exploit (~$1.6M), wound down in September 2025, and suffered a second BT404 accounting exploit in June 2026 that Yuga Labs partially mitigated via a white-hat rescue of 68 NFTs (~$500K-$570K) — holds up well against independent reporting, including names, titles (Michael Figge as Yuga Labs CEO, 0xQuit as VP of Blockchain), the on-chain FLC contract address, and the Etherscan phishing flag on the December 2023 attacker wallet. The weakest points are: (1) FreeLunchCapital's title is given as 'CEO' though no independent source corroborates that specific title (all call him founder/architect/lead developer); (2) the DeFiLlama TVL peak is understated (page says 'over $17 million in late 2023', live DeFiLlama data shows ~$25.65M peaking in early January 2024); and (3) the precise '$9.51' TVL-at-incident figure and the exact Sept 8/Oct 4, 2023 audit dates could not be independently confirmed because docs.fp.io blocks automated access. None of these rise to a contradiction by a more credible source — they are precision/sourcing gaps rather than factual reversals.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}