Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · StablR
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
12 → 12 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423716279
Off-chain at
2026-06-02T02:11:27.727Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
7BzAnmEc1pQVs7cXRzUdkthBmoEeNXNFLtDmi99cgAHy
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1155 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-02T02:11:27.576Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"67c1f560-0143-47ba-8309-7ce127131ff6","new_score":12,"page_slug":"stablr","prev_score":12,"reason":"The StablR investigation page is substantially accurate on the core exploit narrative — the 1-of-3 multisig failure, token amounts minted, ETH proceeds, depeg events, ZachXBT and Oobit responses, and regulatory implications are all confirmed by multiple independent sources. The principal weaknesses are: (1) two dead citations (WhoIsWho Malta and CoinReporter), (2) partially_supported depeg price extremes where the page presents contested low-price figures (EURR €0.70 / USDR $0.40) without clearly distinguishing momentary pool prices from broad market lows, (3) a minor mischaracterization of the Payvision criminal complaint as filed by DNB when it was filed by EFRI citing a DNB report, and (4) the seed round omits investor Maven 11. No claims were found to be outright disputed by a more credible source.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}