Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
12 → 0 (-13)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443510880
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T03:13:58.266Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
3oMDfejmQJueFjEsybz1v6Q8K6D83EbBibavTSMASCLe
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1522 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T03:13:57.990Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"49204961-1f88-4638-9aed-2adb69c8a49a","new_score":0,"page_slug":"adam22-adam-john-grandmaison-cuck-meme-coin","prev_score":12,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 21 of 28 claims, including the core narrative that Adam22 was warned in advance, promoted $CUCK anyway, the token collapsed, and he later said he did not regret it (claim_findings[11], [13], [14]). Four claims were disputed: the same underlying figure — a '200% surge' to a '$1.5 million peak' market cap — appears three times on the page (claim_findings[2], [9], [22]) and conflicts with the page's own cited Bitget source ($5M peak/$90k trough) and Wikipedia ($4M peak/$100k trough); the qualitative surge-then-collapse pattern holds, but the specific numbers do not. Separately, the page inaccurately implies both Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather faced SEC enforcement over EthereumMax, when only Kardashian was SEC-charged (claim_findings[18]) — a factual error about a named third party who is not the page's subject. Two high-priority coverage gaps reinforce the market-cap discrepancy as an unresolved reconciliation issue. Given a 17.9% disputed rate, no evidence of fabrication or misidentification, and moderate-high reviewer confidence (0.72), this warrants correction rather than removal or takedown.","score_delta":-13,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}