Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Saga
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 54 → 54 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462277456
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-28T00:41:50.587Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-28T00:42:38.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-28T00:42:38.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 39YywTXwLGQyvgkp5NoLE9E7RtMyZXyPNB1up2KLY77e
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1402 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"59dd4cc6ff80b546ae5e9e4a1da73d58","decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:41:50.514Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2727,"findings_hash":"813mKREiQk61Xu79p8qMtpvY2NFSessHfUHjAba4mbd1","investigation_id":"9e1f237b-1644-4675-8fac-49a2afcd3c83","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":54,"omissions":{"material":2,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"0983a69dac4378df4b3683fb7503ac9ac5486674b5bf48197ff848ff82a276ed","page_slug":"saga","prev_score":54,"reason":"The core January 2026 exploit account (date, amount, addresses, Tornado Cash routing, inherited ICS20 flaw, advisory details) matches Rekt, The Block and the Cosmos advisory. Weak points are an implied-fault claim about patching that sources do not support, an internal $7M versus $6.2M Tornado Cash inconsistency, and a stale all-time-low figure. The page also misses that SagaEVM is being permanently sunset (final cessation 2026-11-23) and that SAGA pairs were delisted in Sept 2026. Many funding, team and tokenomics claims were not independently checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}