Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#10
Score
20 → 20 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
462175943
Off-chain at
2026-10-27T18:41:58.884Z
Anchored at
2026-10-27T18:42:08.000Z
Block time
2026-10-27T18:42:08.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
CeCEQgDxy2pKtkMJESQRXyTddgKzjxBnHvhnxU7hfQFV
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1435 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"c95096bb6c1fd7734790f842aab6ade3","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:41:58.568Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"f560fedf-cb5b-4bac-8635-73da15489f52","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":20,"page_slug":"axiom-exchange-employee-insider-trading-scandal","prev_score":20,"reason":"The core narrative holds: the February 26, 2026 date, Bauer's role, Axiom's statement and the Polymarket wallet figures match CoinDesk (claim_findings[0], [1], [6]). Of 7 scored claims (one blocked-source claim excluded), 2 could not be verified (about 29%), placing the page in the minor-issues band. The claim that Bauer was suspended (claim_findings[2]) appears in neither cited outlet, and the 'shortly after launch' timing (claim_findings[3]) and the $400K profit figure (claim_findings[4]) are only partly supported. Because the reviewer found a high-priority gap on post-February 2026 developments and the claims about named private individuals could not be checked, the penalty sits in the middle of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":10,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}