Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · World Liberty Financial (WLFI)
- Sequence
- #8
- Score
- 25 → 25 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464261797
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T22:34:35.157Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T22:34:39.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T22:34:39.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GE9rtEPhFeu2eHsXLJf94D1ySwr2c58i3FZY2shwtPkS
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1911 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"0b42f7820dc8f0e284ad6c6e2407cb5c","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T22:34:34.922Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3333,"investigation_id":"f7d68559-4559-4fd6-a089-29023eb665a1","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":25,"page_slug":"world-liberty-financial-wlfi","prev_score":25,"reason":"Two of six sampled claims could not be confirmed (claim_findings[0], the exact January 16, 2025 date of the UAE stake, and claim_findings[4], the $4.6 billion USD1 supply and fourth-largest ranking), giving 33% unverified and none disputed. The page also omits the OCC's August 14, 2026 conditional charter approval and presents the application as pending, and it omits the August 2026 Aqua 1 reporting, both rated material. The core allegations that were checked (the Sun lawsuit, the Lazarus-linked sale, the UAE stake and the Khanna probe) matched their sources, so the penalty reflects an out-of-date page and unconfirmed figures, not fabricated claims. The reviewer's confidence is moderate (0.5) and it sampled only a fraction of the cited sources, so the penalty sits in the lower-middle of the band and the page is not delisted.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":8,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The OCC conditionally approved World Liberty Trust Company's trust charter on 2026-08-14 while the page presents the application as pending (subject_status.contradicts_page is true), and a second material omission (Aqua 1 purchase reporting) is also open. This confirms the significant band rather than a lighter one."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}