Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T21:40:33.412Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"9c0b3b9e-05da-4d77-a230-19cfa8df272d","new_score":33,"page_slug":"apyx-finance","prev_score":38,"reason":"The review found zero disputed claims across 30 assessed items, with 24 confirmed and 4 partially supported. The partially supported findings (claim_findings[3], [6], [22], [23]) are minor: the SATA allocation figure is slightly overstated relative to more granular data, the cooldown period has an internal inconsistency in official docs, and funding round figures are already flagged as low-confidence on the page itself. The principal concern is claim_findings[7], a specific $23.4 million per-year yield discrepancy attributed to 'one independent analysis' — the reviewer could not locate this figure in any cited article upon direct fetch, making it unverifiable. This unsourced accounting allegation sits in a high-severity section without the same hedging language the page applies to its funding figures, and should be sourced or removed before the next review cycle. The modest score penalty reflects this single unverified claim in an otherwise well-evidenced page. Three high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain reserve verification, redemption stress test, Strategy balance sheet analysis) are noted for expansion but do not affect factual accuracy.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}