Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Bitcoin Latinum (LTNM) / Monsoon Blockchain Corporation
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443505084
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-08T01:02:03.993Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Cg9LdGXBbgShxbyPZTgiC7dUM2GQCCNsjTDxyk4Zcbs4
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1358 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-08T01:02:03.723Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"2310f6fe-98ef-4dfb-8042-0ce40c2a03d7","new_score":2,"page_slug":"bitcoin-latinum-ltnm-monsoon-blockchain-corporation","prev_score":2,"reason":"The reviewer checked 18 claims and found zero directly disputed. Two minor issues were flagged as partially supported: the project launch date in the timeline uses a January 2020 placeholder when the actual public launch was November 2020 (claim_findings[15]), and the '60% misappropriation' threshold is arithmetically 59.1% from the enumerated line items (claim_findings[5]) — neither touches the core enforcement allegations. One claim is unverifiable in exact detail (claim_findings[9], the January 2022 price floor) but is directionally consistent with all accessible sources. The primary source — SEC litigation release lr-26530 — is independently confirmed accessible. A high-priority coverage gap exists around case status developments since the April 2026 filing, but the page is factually accurate as stated; that gap warrants expansion rather than revision. With a disputed_pct of 5.6% and reviewer confidence of 0.82, the page meets the approval threshold.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}