Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · OKB
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 35 → 25 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 419479110
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-13T13:26:46.532Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7VzhgobyQxad7sjp5wPWePuufuDL7xrcnrrkxSShMwtZ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1487 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-13T13:26:46.290Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"1ed1bc35-7c4b-4a6f-8e5d-c4227c374a01","new_score":25,"page_slug":"okb","prev_score":35,"reason":"The investigation is well-sourced on its core DOJ settlement, Malta FIAU fine, Lazarus Group DEX aggregator incident, OKB flash crash, SIM swap, Philippines SEC, and August 2025 tokenomics findings — 28 of 38 claims confirmed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources. However, a systematic date error propagates through sections[2] and the timeline: the FinCEN/U.S. Treasury designation of Huione Group is placed at 'May 2024' throughout (claim_findings[14], [15], [16], and timeline entry dated 2024-05-01), when the actual NPRM date is May 1, 2025 per FinCEN.gov. This one-year error misframes the post-guilty-plea compliance narrative — the article implies $161 million flowed into OKX after a 2024 designation, whereas the designation was contemporaneous with the February 2025 guilty plea. The summary also describes OKX as 'founded in 2017 by Star Xu' (claim_findings[0]) while the body sections correctly identify 2013 as the Okcoin founding date, creating an internal inconsistency visible in the highest-traffic part of the page. These issues require targeted corrections before the page is accurate; no other findings are of comparable severity.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}