Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · WAYGU CASH
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#1
Score
18 → 18 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
419388807
Off-chain at
2026-05-13T03:26:04.893Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
2uedcFNGb8Z7wrn3AHAF8jzYct7YnsD4f2pAzcTXneuQ
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1177 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-13T03:26:04.695Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"6e6d83f0-9fb9-4fee-a5dd-a32f291c6c42","new_score":18,"page_slug":"waygu","prev_score":18,"reason":"The WAYGU CASH investigation page is largely accurate and well-sourced for a micro-cap memecoin analysis. All price and market data claims are confirmed by CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap, the Solidus Labs statistics are sourced from a real report (with a minor figure discrepancy: the page cites 98.7% vs the report's 98.6%), and the related-entity distinctions are correctly drawn and sourced. Two claims have minor gaps: the page overstates complete team anonymity when the project itself promotes a pseudonymous developer persona ('1000x Dev'), and the CoinGecko/CMC listing date of July 1, 2025 could not be independently verified. The most material unaddressed risks are the absence of on-chain holder distribution data, liquidity lock status, and mint/freeze authority status — all of which are critical for rug-pull risk assessment.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}