Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Axiom
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
32 → 17 (-15)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
419602868
Off-chain at
2026-05-14T03:10:23.174Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
2uX5Ruqx72ExvFGzr8H8rBJ1J2XV1Ebm32zCM7SZ2V1S
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1126 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-14T03:10:23.053Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"7f4d6a96-ca13-4a3b-b7d2-a1e568a9f840","new_score":17,"page_slug":"axiom","prev_score":32,"reason":"The page's core allegations—the ZachXBT exposé, named individuals, dashboard access abuse, and Axiom's response—are well-supported by multiple Tier 1-2 sources. However, three material factual errors warrant revision: (1) claim_findings[25] places the $300M milestone on Feb 2026 when it was reached ~Oct 2025 (4 months late); (2) claim_findings[24] falsely states Polymarket the platform faced DOJ/CFTC action, when the action targeted an individual user; (3) claim_findings[21] understates auth-axiom.trade as 'medium-risk' when PhishDestroy scores it 98/100 (HIGH risk). Additional claim duration discrepancies ('13 months' vs. ~10 months in independent sources) and unverifiable details reduce confidence. Coverage gaps are legitimate expansion areas, not grounds for denial.","score_delta":-15,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}