Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T03:08:21.606Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"2b664b6f-b5d4-4fb4-9681-789b29bd7e8d","new_score":34,"page_slug":"boltz-bitcoin-bridge","prev_score":42,"reason":"The fact-check found no disputed claims among 41 items checked (disputed_pct 4.9%), and the central narrative -- the August 3 suspension, its stated AI-related cause, the ~$262,000 TVL figure, the warrant canary timeline, and the founder exit -- is corroborated verbatim by multiple independent outlets (claim_findings[1], [15]-[17], [25]-[29]). That said, the page states on its own authority that Boltz is the 'first publicly documented' case of a service self-shutting down over AI-accelerated exploitation, a superlative no cited source actually makes (claim_findings[37]). The review also flagged a high-priority coverage gap: no source provides technical detail (attack vectors, what was actually compromised) behind the central 'several exploits succeeded' claim. Combined with a handful of minor precision issues -- an imprecise incorporation date, an uncited editorial 'single point of failure' framing, an unsourced 'gratitude' characterization, and a status-date/citation mismatch (claim_findings[7], [4], [22], [23]) -- these push the page toward a light revision rather than a clean approval, though nothing found undermines the page's core claims.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}