Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 15 → 15 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462186051
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:17:29.802Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:17:51.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:17:51.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 78cbkktod41jkcZvL1rzNFaGPswtHDdmQRXKr7fRf68v
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1431 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"376bd18e42b6697871e521eb9ffb6878","decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:17:29.656Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1111,"findings_hash":"3t1BnjhemmdrCawWspoJ32mis6JMg6uDJ1QddumaP3KR","investigation_id":"e2a6bd01-0bad-443c-ad0b-5683f093c8ea","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":15,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"86d21ea033025da0073899ce6927064659cd85b8f5ec4486230a9cdaffb87e5c","page_slug":"early-solana-whale-genesis-allocation-theft","prev_score":15,"reason":"The core facts (amount, value, July 10 date, ZachXBT and Specter involvement, unconfirmed attack method and destination) match the cited sources, and the page hedges appropriately on the Phemex Tornado Cash claim and date conflict. Weaknesses: the claim that the full amount was bridged is not supported by the cited sources and may be overstated, the Specter-first sequencing is not stated in the sources, and the $25.6M comparison is unsourced. I did not fetch every cited source (ChainCatcher, Odaily, CryptoBriefing and Decrypt were not fetched).","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}