Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #1
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462046669
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T11:03:39.951Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T11:03:49.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T11:03:49.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- CWNcui5GHnRH39vKEG5bvPr5JUjSzKhdArBJm52e3cLD
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1243 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"dcf3a376a9dd77e48d72eaf560557c73","decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:03:39.702Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"Af4vePNoBgELAdkvqWqQR9PNwd2eKBkj1FMqsA5JsRwS","investigation_id":"e65613ca-425b-42b6-8039-f452581efd01","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"67fdcd17e27742324d635a4b22c6b4c8c80d1a50b86c102b0012523d9da43f73","page_slug":"anwen-technology-co-ltd-xinbipay-newpay","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core claims hold up against Treasury, TRM, Chainalysis and crypto.news: the designation date and basis, the Cambodia base, the XinbiPay/NewPay development, and the dollar figures. Minor overreach: the page says Anwen 'operated' the app and gives a March 2025 Telegram ban where the source says spring 2025. The sanctions status is current and no delisting was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"sanctioned","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}