Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Madlads
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 75 → 75 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423953165
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-03T04:20:57.300Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9QAtyd8AdEUcE1TraKBusZotmEyTkQwuvmVciV81uiZy
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1165 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T04:20:57.097Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"42e6f3f7-8b37-4208-b87b-af8d856cb498","new_score":75,"page_slug":"madlads","prev_score":75,"reason":"The Madlads investigation page is substantially accurate. Core claims about the founders' backgrounds, the FTX collapse losses, the honeypot mint strategy, and the Backpack/FTX EU acquisition are all independently verifiable from credible sources. The main issues are: (1) the claim that Mad Lads 'flipped all collections on both Solana and Ethereum' is overstated — it reached No. 2 across chains, not No. 1; (2) the percentage of operating funds lost in FTX collapse is cited as '88%' in the timeline but Tier-1 sources cite '80%'; (3) three cited URLs return 404 (Cointelegraph court article, Cointelegraph Magazine feature, NFTNow guide) and two return 403, reducing verifiability of inline citations; (4) several timeline entries incorrectly cite the Cointelegraph FTX court article as the source for unrelated facts.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}