Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 457924334
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-17T05:42:21.001Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-17T05:42:48.248Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- mqP7zKunGx4KWGJm7Sj5pNLXPx4P8iHuh78P3ekqvW5
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2078 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"4711fcba5b8c7836162372710a3084a5","decided_at":"2026-10-17T05:42:20.813Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1667,"findings_hash":"8mpH3m2Wdz2cVR2tBW1715bhJYqTprvMrJXoST3NjoZV","investigation_id":"de767707-c9cc-4b3a-a429-cb1b084df0cc","mode":"findings_only","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"471bb6acc27c8e7898160d51a410f32b60ed655ed592b9b96549f161dc4ec80e","page_slug":"miloud-abderrahmane-isis-tron-facilitator-france","prev_score":0,"reason":"The page's core claims are well supported by primary sources: the OFAC/Treasury designation date, legal basis, identity details (name, alias, DOB, nationality), the two TRON wallet addresses, the explosives-instruction allegation, and the broader co-designee network all check out against the Treasury press release, the OFAC SDN entry, and the TRM Labs/Chainalysis/Bitrace posts cited. Three issues stood out: (1) an uncited and seemingly overstated editorial claim, repeated in both the summary and a section, that this designation is one of 'very few'/'notably rare' examples of OFAC naming an individual's wallet addresses — several comparable 2023-2026 Hamas- and Houthi-related designations contradict that framing; (2) a factual slip describing all three Nigerian bureau de change firms as 'Lagos-based' when one is registered in Kano, a different state; and (3) a misattribution of the 'ISIS-linked fundraising campaigns' finding to Bitrace when it actually appears in the TRM Labs post, plus an inferential overstatement treating as settled fact that the OFAC-published addresses are the same ones that evaded the 2024 NBCTF freeze, which the cited Bitrace post does not establish. The claim that no criminal charges have been reported against Abderrahmane could not be independently confirmed either way. Coverage gaps include any French legal/law-enforcement response and independent on-chain verification beyond vendor blog summaries.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}