Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · RiskOnBlast
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
464375719
Off-chain at
2026-11-02T05:21:15.278Z
Anchored at
2026-11-02T05:21:30.000Z
Block time
2026-11-02T05:21:30.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
6hj9uwZZprf43sGo6uEDjZK3GMvkMvXA7B9XX5x8DSN8
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1460 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"728274ddc9f954a1b885acadb10b519e","decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:21:15.227Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1818,"findings_hash":"Dvzu7m7t8XqPn5JLsAzW3ficBFmXG9WBPQ8FQ4Fdpp2t","investigation_id":"a6524f87-aa19-43ce-821b-8cc026828096","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"55ca773e88d3639c6d02dc7763f3e69039cf44123c8e7449ed341390a3345d88","page_slug":"riskonblast","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core facts hold and match CoinDesk and CertiK: a roughly 420 ETH rug pull on Feb 24, 2024, the addresses, the 14:35 UTC withdrawal, the laundering amounts and the 750-wallet figure. Problems are in details. The page calls the IDO both 'uncapped' and capped. It dates the IDO close to Feb 23, while CertiK puts the cap-reaching deposit 17 minutes before the Feb 24 withdrawal. It describes a 'rating' where the source reports only an X comment. The $20M group total, several per-project loss figures, the Andrew Choi alert and the top-three ranking were not confirmed. Several cited sources were not fetched.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}