Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Mt. Gox
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 419577255
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-14T00:19:57.773Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 62cTAYmvzuHYnXoYGMhg36y2XehmKzxE1uAsfWP1rtpe
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (881 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-14T00:19:57.639Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"3e455e13-615d-4c36-820a-3f61e6e3df11","new_score":2,"page_slug":"mt-gox","prev_score":2,"reason":"31 of 36 claims confirmed; disputed percentage is 8.3%, within the approval threshold. The two disputed findings both concern the same minor factual error: the date Mt. Gox's liquidation was approved (page states April 24, 2014; multiple Tier 2 sources cite April 16, 2014). This is a correctable timeline error and does not undermine the investigation's core narrative. Partially supported claims (June 2011 BTC count variance, McCaleb sale terms nuance) are minor contextual details. No link rot detected. Reviewer confidence is 0.85.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}