Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T14:19:29.435Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"3c1969e1-ee54-409a-a92b-1b829b3d76c6","new_score":0,"page_slug":"bonkdao-treasury-governance-attack","prev_score":3,"reason":"This page's central narrative — the July 6, 2026 $20 million BonkDAO treasury drain via a $4.4 million quorum-buying attack on proposal BIP-76, the seven-wallet vote with 99.9% approval on 2.9% turnout, and the 'governance design flaw, not a code bug' framing — is well corroborated by independent sources (21 of 28 claims confirmed). However, the review found that the page's own cited source directly contradicts its claim that this was 'the most significant governance-attack-as-exploit in Solana DAO history' (claim_findings[2]), and the stated price decline is internally inconsistent with the page's own arithmetic and appears to blend an hours-scale move with a later, multi-day cumulative decline (claim_findings[16]). A security firm is also credited with a three-part causal finding it only partly made (claim_findings[13]), and dollar figures describing how the stolen funds moved are individually accurate but arranged so as to imply they sum to the total drained when in fact they exceed it (claim_findings[10], [12]). Separately, this page is a near-duplicate of another live AVOID investigation covering the same event, and the two disagree on the size and timing of the price crash and on whether a loan helped finance the attack — a consistency problem for readers that the review flags as its top-priority coverage gap, alongside under-covered items including a named public dispute over the incident's legal characterization and missing follow-up on recovery and attribution efforts.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}