Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Pendle
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 55 → 50 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425397290
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T20:09:10.463Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- CoFaVjCEjeN3pVm9pCbczneU1NSsDQGGig9ywbL1Me6n
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1469 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T20:09:10.262Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"43bf3752-0fb6-4f41-89f8-0024428087f8","new_score":50,"page_slug":"pendle","prev_score":55,"reason":"The review found 17 of 25 claims fully confirmed, with only 1 disputed claim (claim_findings[22]: the '$1.2 billion total 2024 crypto theft' figure, which Chainalysis and other Tier 1 sources place at approximately $2.2 billion — making the stated 2.2% Penpie contribution roughly half the correct proportion). The core technical and factual claims about the exploit, attacker addresses, audit failures, and fund laundering are well-sourced and confirmed. Minor issues include the Pendle mainnet date (June 16 vs June 17 UTC per official Tier 1 sources, claim_findings[1]), TN Lee's Kyber Network role understated as 'Business Development' rather than co-founder (claim_findings[2]), and two cited URLs returning 404 (Zokyo post-mortem blog and Cointelegraph Magazine — confirmed via search snippets but link rot present). A high-priority coverage gap on victim compensation and restitution was identified; this omission is material to readers assessing user risk. The page should correct the $1.2B figure, update TN Lee's biographical detail, and add a section addressing what Penpie did or did not do for affected users.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}