Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · USDS
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 63 → 63 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443525138
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-27T10:11:26.895Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Dju2zpbV9VkusxYzgDwfcBAfa8qWeDEchCD6bxYdQdJB
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1417 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T10:11:26.507Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"8c9f63d8-429b-485d-a10b-9975e2ab32de","new_score":63,"page_slug":"usds","prev_score":63,"reason":"The page correctly classifies USDS as crypto-collateralised and governance-controlled rather than fiat-reserve-backed or algorithmic, and handles the freeze-function controversy carefully — accurately distinguishing a dormant, governance-gated capability from an exercised action, which independent research confirms has never been triggered. The $756M EOA custody controversy and GENIUS Act context are both accurately and specifically sourced. However, three claims are disputed: the Endgame/MKR-governance approval date (2023-01-01) is contradicted by both the page's own cited source (which says November 2024) and independent reporting (which documents a distinct March 27, 2023 vote); and the section-5 account of an internal rebrand-rejection vote 'before' Sky/USDS branding was adopted has the chronology and outcome backwards relative to its own cited source. One claim (MKR/DAI balances 'remaining usable indefinitely') is stale due to an escalating 2025 conversion penalty the page omits, and one (multi-token coexistence) is partially supported for the same reason.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}