Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"ad1c00b42b4484789cb78148996c1fe0","band_override":{"actual_delta":-12,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.3,"expected_delta_range":[-30,-15],"expected_verdict":"review_revise","rationale":"Of 10 claims checked, none were disputed and 3 could not be verified (30%, computed from claim_findings, which sits at the top edge of the minor band). The unverified items are the $88/week and $200/month pricing (claim_findings[2]), the 131 U.S.-targeted templates (claim_findings[4]) and the 'no public ruling as of September 2026' statement (claim_findings[9]). The first two were not found in the sources the reviewer opened, and the reviewer did not check the other cited sources. The third is an absence claim that is now a month or more old. The core allegations are confirmed: the Google lawsuit, the $1.9B and 3.87M card figures, the $100,000 seizure and the Group-IB findings. The FBI announcement date differs between sources (June 12 or 13; claim_findings[0]), and the template count and domains-versus-pages wording are only partly supported (claim_findings[3] and [5]). The review found no omissions and no change in the subject's status, so the page gets a small penalty and a minor-issues banner, not a status change."},"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:03:11.806Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3,"investigation_id":"26899ff2-1782-4759-9903-32a037ecce58","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"outsider-enterprise","prev_score":0,"reason":"Of 10 claims checked, none were disputed and 3 could not be verified (30%, computed from claim_findings, which sits at the top edge of the minor band). The unverified items are the $88/week and $200/month pricing (claim_findings[2]), the 131 U.S.-targeted templates (claim_findings[4]) and the 'no public ruling as of September 2026' statement (claim_findings[9]). The first two were not found in the sources the reviewer opened, and the reviewer did not check the other cited sources. The third is an absence claim that is now a month or more old. The core allegations are confirmed: the Google lawsuit, the $1.9B and 3.87M card figures, the $100,000 seizure and the Group-IB findings. The FBI announcement date differs between sources (June 12 or 13; claim_findings[0]), and the template count and domains-versus-pages wording are only partly supported (claim_findings[3] and [5]). The review found no omissions and no change in the subject's status, so the page gets a small penalty and a minor-issues banner, not a status change.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}