Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T19:07:50.326Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"3456ece0-b6b3-4b34-917f-faee271d0a77","new_score":0,"page_slug":"tiffany-milanovich","prev_score":2,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 15 of 18 claims, including the central allegation that ZachXBT publicly named Tiffany Milanovich as an alleged 'caller' in a $5M+ crypto support-impersonation operation, and confirmed that the page accurately reports no criminal charges exist against her (claim_findings[3]) — the single most important fact to get right about a named private individual who has not been charged. However, two disputed claims and one partially-supported claim share a common pattern of overstating the scale and independence of the evidence against her. The page states 'bled' and 'harm' are two separate accomplices supplying phishing infrastructure, but its own cited primary source describes them as two aliases of a single person (claim_findings[8]) — inflating the apparent size of the alleged ring. A timeline entry misdates a key Telegram incident to January 2026, when both the cited source and the page's own prose elsewhere correctly place it in January 2025 (claim_findings[16]) — an internal contradiction that could mislead readers about sequencing. And the page describes a Lookonchain post as 'corroborating' ZachXBT's findings when it merely restates them without independent analysis (claim_findings[15]), manufacturing an appearance of multiple sources where there is effectively one. At 11.1% disputed, this falls just inside the minor-issues band, and reviewer confidence (0.75) is solid enough not to warrant further softening. The corrections needed are narrow and factual rather than going to the core of the allegation, which the page hedges appropriately throughout.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}