Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Antier Solutions
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#5
Score
47 → 27 (-20)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
461978834
Off-chain at
2026-10-27T07:03:20.731Z
Anchored at
2026-10-27T07:03:25.000Z
Block time
2026-10-27T07:03:25.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
GGw3UAibZugHBiEnbDLBcbpaPWVGgFUQ4D9BTDTCqdzs
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2751 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"bf1d3eb604ab3200f2c12cad48c839c7","band_override":{"actual_delta":-28,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.625,"expected_delta_range":[-50,-30],"expected_verdict":"review_deny","rationale":"Five of eight claims (62.5%) were either disputed or could not be verified, which on numbers alone is the failed-factcheck band. The core legal narrative holds: the September 2025 indictment, the March 2026 unsealing and the GVFL funding are confirmed (claim_findings[0], [1], [5]). Only one claim is actually contradicted: the 'over $25 million seized' figure (claim_findings[2]), which the IRS release puts at more than $1 million. The four unverifiable items (claim_findings[3], [4], [6], [7]) were mostly not fetched or not found rather than refuted, and the reviewer's confidence is 0.55, so the page is marked down to the top of the significant-issues band instead of being failed and delisted. The seizure figure and the unconfirmed 60+ cryptocurrencies and $3,000-per-month details should be corrected or sourced, and the open high-priority gap on the court docket and Sabby Singh's case status should be filled."},"decided_at":"2026-10-27T07:03:20.297Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.625,"investigation_id":"267d153e-70a8-4b9d-9d10-4c100539b9f4","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":27,"page_slug":"antier-solutions","prev_score":47,"reason":"Five of eight claims (62.5%) were either disputed or could not be verified, which on numbers alone is the failed-factcheck band. The core legal narrative holds: the September 2025 indictment, the March 2026 unsealing and the GVFL funding are confirmed (claim_findings[0], [1], [5]). Only one claim is actually contradicted: the 'over $25 million seized' figure (claim_findings[2]), which the IRS release puts at more than $1 million. The four unverifiable items (claim_findings[3], [4], [6], [7]) were mostly not fetched or not found rather than refuted, and the reviewer's confidence is 0.55, so the page is marked down to the top of the significant-issues band instead of being failed and delisted. The seizure figure and the unconfirmed 60+ cryptocurrencies and $3,000-per-month details should be corrected or sourced, and the open high-priority gap on the court docket and Sabby Singh's case status should be filled.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-20,"score_limit":{"applied":-20,"limited":true,"proposed":-28,"rule":"limited_no_second_opinion","second":null},"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}