Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_deny · Bitcoin Mission
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 25 → 0 (-35)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426265986
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T19:52:30.526Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- zF297fJVG8RvMwtwo1PTdhsxfquopAjewqw1Ci6n5X4
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1342 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T19:52:30.310Z","decision":"review_deny","investigation_id":"5d69fe15-d330-4f21-92cb-f20b3b737182","new_score":0,"page_slug":"bitcoin-mission","prev_score":25,"reason":"The page's foundational claim — that on-chain investigator ZachXBT flagged an entity called 'Bitcoin Mission' — cannot be independently verified through any public source, including ZachXBT's own Telegram channel (claim_findings[0], [3], [4]). Three of five claims are unverifiable, and all three are load-bearing for the trust score of 25. The review also confirms that at least two distinct legitimate entities share the 'Bitcoin Mission' name (claim_findings[2]), meaning a low trust score applied to an unidentified entity poses active defamation risk. Structural defects compound the problem: all page sections are empty and sources are misplaced in metadata fields rather than body content (coverage_gaps: 'Section content', priority high). The page as published does not meet minimum evidentiary standards for a AVOID.NET listing and must be delisted pending a positive source citation for the ZachXBT flag and unambiguous identification of the specific entity under investigation.","score_delta":-35,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}