Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Swift Wave Capital
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 3 → 0 (-3)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 422970883
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-29T16:03:17.737Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6AyLawzuo7kD5xQtiv9Ki3Fp5hWzLnY5hVLeh2YXeqi6
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1748 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-29T16:03:17.582Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"38028cad-a894-43d9-97e6-e615c2151184","new_score":0,"page_slug":"swift-wave-capital","prev_score":3,"reason":"The review found zero actively disputed claims across 29 total findings, with a reported disputed_pct of 7% driven entirely by unverifiable and partially-supported findings rather than counter-evidence. Core allegations — the Ponzi mechanics, domain registration data, MLM tier structure, FMA regulatory warning, DOJ charges, and Tether freeze figures — are all confirmed by independent sources including Tier-1 regulatory and government outlets. The primary weaknesses identified are a misattribution in sections[6] and timeline[8] where $92 million in fund movements is credited to 'DOJ and Chainalysis' when the primary documenter was ZachXBT (claim_findings[21]), and an internal inconsistency between sections[3] describing a 'mid-2025' BG Wealth launch and the correctly dated January 2025 timeline entry (claim_findings[10]). Two claims — fake FinCEN certificates (claim_findings[9]) and Chinese-language source code (claim_findings[17]) — could not be independently verified from retrieved source text but are consistent with BehindMLM's documented methodology for this class of scheme. The page applies appropriate epistemic hedging throughout, particularly on operator-identity overlap with BG Wealth/DSJ. A small score penalty is applied for the source misattribution and internal date inconsistency; these warrant correction but do not materially undermine the page's integrity.","score_delta":-3,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}