Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T04:14:14.668Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"9683fd9b-8608-4fba-9b24-0c1e301c6211","new_score":82,"page_slug":"blackrock-usd-institutional-digital-liquidity-fund","prev_score":82,"reason":"Of 23 checkable claims on this page, 16 were confirmed, 4 partially supported, 1 was stale, and 2 were disputed, with zero unverifiable claims or dead links. That works out to a disputed rate of 8.7% (2 of 23), which falls within the approval range. The two disputed items (claim_findings[9] and claim_findings[16]) are timeline dates for the multi-chain expansion and the $1 billion AUM milestone; both are contradicted by the page's own cited sources by several weeks in a different month, so they are real date errors rather than a known 'default to the first of the month' artifact. However, the underlying events they describe are independently confirmed elsewhere on the page (claim_findings[8] and claim_findings[15]), so these are narrow timeline-precision errors, not disputes over whether something happened or who was involved. No claim alleging wrongdoing was found to be false, and no core allegation is in dispute. The review also raised a high-priority note that the page contains no adverse allegation against BlackRock, Securitize, or BNY Mellon at all -- its own Controversies section states no enforcement actions, lawsuits, hacks, or exploits were found. That note does not identify any inaccuracy or gap in the page's content; it raises a separate editorial question about whether a page like this belongs in the index, which this review process is not positioned to resolve and which is treated here as context rather than a penalty trigger. Two secondary issues are noted for future revision without changing the outcome: the Regulatory Status section omits the Investment Company Act Section 3(c)(7) exemption that explains the fund's qualified-purchaser minimum (claim_findings[4]), and the claimed rise in minimum investment from $100,000 to $5 million (claim_findings[6]) is contradicted by BlackRock's own launch-day materials, which cite a $5 million minimum from inception -- a firmer objection than its 'partially supported' label conveys, though not one that changes the disputed-rate calculation or the banding outcome.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}