Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Superfluid
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 65 → 65 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465107324
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-04T00:53:23.650Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-04T00:53:36.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-04T00:53:36.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- B1dEL8ZpTq7wJ5qUEAsVRBrCmhdypXGoT7KYTdtQ7q6Q
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1261 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"90eeae5d06d30d9e5bce05a564f9a94e","decided_at":"2026-11-04T00:53:23.588Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.25,"findings_hash":"5iGnE3QKW59fRaSMbG3ZR6ZTwVBCykp9fHE5spayZRyv","investigation_id":"3fa226c1-40b6-4785-9498-9ad2b6d997fb","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":65,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"bf94937f16d8b45db02dc025048a8c2b7ea8a2c50bc6e4a70679663afae448a6","page_slug":"superfluid","prev_score":65,"reason":"The February 2022 exploit narrative is well supported by Rekt (time, amount, address, bounty, compensation). Gaps: the Tornado Cash funding claim is unsupported by the source checked, the SUP allocation figures sum to more than 100% (the source is itself overlapping), and the November 2025 TGE date is unverified. The page omits the September 2026 Celo/GoodDollar exploit, which the accepted submission documents.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}