Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T00:03:57.177Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"8b05afa2-b3b1-4812-a3c2-2b69513839e8","new_score":21,"page_slug":"verus-protocol-vrsc","prev_score":21,"reason":"Of 21 factual claims checked, 19 were independently confirmed and none were disputed or found unverifiable, putting disputed_pct at 0% under the reviewer's own methodology (claim_findings[9] and claim_findings[14] are the only non-confirmed items, and both are 'partially_supported' citation mismatches rather than factual errors). claim_findings[9] found that a Wormhole/Nomad comparison was correctly attributed to Merkle Science but overstated in also crediting Halborn; claim_findings[14] found a TVL decline figure that is true and independently verifiable but not present in the specific sources the page cited for it. Neither defect makes any statement on the page inaccurate, and the reviewer confirmed the page's hedged language and its deliberate avoidance of an unsupported 'inactive team' claim. The one high-priority coverage gap (present-day status of the bridge after July 23) is a completeness issue, not an accuracy one: the page never asserts the bridge is currently open, closed, or safe, so the gap does not make any existing claim misleading — it flags an opportunity for a follow-up update rather than a defect in what's already published.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}