Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Lab
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
8 → 8 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443511996
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T07:04:19.690Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
EMSxfirnxqrdfBx4bDTVdtoHVAgCxYjibMsALcFNZXAi
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1737 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T07:04:19.536Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"08c005d3-9ebb-4c40-bf5e-1c55a285674d","new_score":8,"page_slug":"lab","prev_score":8,"reason":"The page's core narrative -- ZachXBT's allegations of insider supply control, the BVI loan agreement, OTC/vesting manipulation, the July 2026 token dump, and the Eesee founders' history -- is well supported by its cited sources, with direct quotations (including the Simon Dedic 'ponzi playbook' quote and the LAB team's 'large market participants' statement) verified verbatim. The main weaknesses found are: (1) a genuine internal inconsistency in the Tokenomics section conflating a ~$6/token price point ($6B FDV) with the token's actual $24-27 peak price weeks later, which cannot mathematically coexist at 1B total supply; (2) the page's uniform use of a $24 all-time-high figure, which undercounts CoinMarketCap's own listed ATH of $27.22 on June 2, 2026; (3) two dead citations (MEXC News, WEEX wiki) affecting several claims, one of which (the 77% locked-supply figure) could not be corroborated elsewhere; and (4) several instances where a section's specific figures are accurate and corroborated by outside reporting but not actually supported by the specific sources cited in that section (the RIVER-link wallet/TRM Labs/Arkham details, the SKYAI naming, and the founder-identification claims in the Project Overview section). No entity-identity confusion with a different 'Lab'-named project was found; all sources consistently describe the same Binance Alpha-listed AI trading terminal.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}