Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Pump.fun
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#1
Score
18 → 18 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
419601697
Off-chain at
2026-05-14T03:02:36.302Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
5MEhEwHYbcCUU7oUSTeriTvs4kuCMiCRQN6h5bff9tHg
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1249 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-14T03:02:36.114Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"fa06b8b3-2ac4-4a63-8675-0ab6f6e2465f","new_score":18,"page_slug":"pump-fun","prev_score":18,"reason":"The Pump.fun investigation page is substantively accurate on its core allegations — the lawsuit, FCA warning, Lazarus Group laundering, Solidus Labs findings, insider exploit, and ICO mechanics are all well-supported by credible independent sources. Two claims are materially disputed: the '40% team and investor allocation' overstates the actual 33% figure, and the 'no vesting on team tokens' claim is factually incorrect as team tokens carry a 12-month cliff with 36-month subsequent vesting. Several claims are partially supported but involve minor mischaracterizations: the Jito Labs dismissal was plaintiff-initiated rather than a motion to dismiss victory; the Gen Z Quant $50,000 profit was cumulative across multiple tokens; the MistaFuccYou incident occurred in February 2025 not November 2024; and the PUMP token graduation threshold and Raydium routing information reflects outdated mechanics.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}