Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Helius
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 70 → 70 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 424142212
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-04T01:15:16.953Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7P2zMk9dkRa9jXmtuU8FHscauEXZcb4NPMXdPJyUPN1Y
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (935 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-04T01:15:16.820Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"f145b6a3-7c14-47bc-a047-8fb0ab67e449","new_score":70,"page_slug":"helius","prev_score":70,"reason":"The Helius investigation page is largely accurate and well-sourced across its core claims about funding, products, and the CEO conduct allegations. The primary factual errors are: (1) total funding stated as $34.85M when arithmetic and multiple sources support $34.35M (a $0.5M overstatement); (2) an incorrect claim that Helius Medical Technologies 'changed its ticker to HSDT' when HSDT was always its ticker — only the company name changed. No link rot was detected. The unverifiable claim (90-day incident breakdown) is a specificity issue with the StatusGator source, not a contradiction.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}