Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T23:00:38.751Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"a8f09035-635e-4b29-9611-310c173e1f31","new_score":0,"page_slug":"nobitex-wallex-bitpin-ramzinex","prev_score":2,"reason":"The page's central reporting — the June 2, 2026 OFAC designation, its legal basis, the named individuals, and the exchange volume and hack figures — is well supported by Treasury and credible research sources, and the executive-order citation for these entities checks out correctly against the primary source. However, independently recounting the review's 50 claim findings against the reviewer's own disputed_pct formula (disputed + unverifiable, excluding partially_supported) yields 5/50 = 10.0% — landing exactly on the approve/revise boundary. Several of the underlying issues carry real weight for a page covering four named businesses: the summary attributes the Central Bank of Iran's USDT acquisition to 'the four exchanges collectively' when sourcing ties it specifically to Nobitex; a $2.3 billion figure is presented as an OFAC allegation when it actually originates from a separate Reuters investigation; and a $1 billion 'seizure' figure appears to conflate a routed-funds estimate with a cumulative seizure total. A granular claim about an individual authoring specific software and updating it 17 times could not be verified anywhere and drops a source's own hedge. Given the exact boundary result and these attribution and sourcing problems concentrated on claims about named entities and individuals, this is resolved toward a light revision rather than approval.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}