Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · JUST
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 32 → 12 (-20)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464443082
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T09:21:24.618Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T09:21:47.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T09:21:47.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- JBhx4HxpeAhiQda8a4Y2HfkRMYDTNZpJV5DYMLnzqUST
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2071 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"c341f46b9ad73b09c4f302df6899df0b","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:21:24.345Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2727,"investigation_id":"83202427-0b36-4520-84f8-86091ffe725b","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":12,"page_slug":"just-jst","prev_score":32,"reason":"The page's summary says Justin Sun still faces SEC fraud charges, but the cited CoinDesk article says the SEC agreed to dismiss all claims against him, pending court approval (claim_findings[0], omission_findings[0]). The WLFI investment is given as about $75M where the cited source says $45M (claim_findings[2]). The $700M frozen-token figure could not be traced (claim_findings[5]). The October 2022 rug pull is stated as established fact when the source only reports a PeckShield flag (claim_findings[6], [7]). Several core news items were confirmed, the project is still operating, and one source was unreadable, which limits coverage but is not counted against the page. The reviewer's confidence is moderate, so the penalty sits in the middle of the significant band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-20,"score_limit":{"applied":-20,"limited":false,"proposed":-20,"rule":"second_opinion_agreed","second":-20},"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":3,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"minor","reason":"The percentage (3 of 11 countable claims, about 27%) implies the minor band. The review reports a material omission: the page does not say the SEC settlement would dismiss all claims against Justin Sun with prejudice. Its summary also calls this charge current, which the cited source does not support (claim_findings[0], omission_findings[0]). This is the page's core allegation, so it is judged in the significant band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}