Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T11:29:28.608Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"cb4fa2c8-da5a-4b47-b070-7b61d3112ebd","new_score":0,"page_slug":"pumpdotfun","prev_score":8,"reason":"None of the page's 23 checked claims were rated disputed or unverifiable, so the raw dispute rate is 0%, which on its own would support approval. But the review also flagged three high-priority coverage gaps and three citations that have gone stale, and the spec allows either of those findings to push a page from approval into revision even when the dispute rate is low. The most serious is claim_findings[10]: the page's timeline says exploiter Jarett Dunn was 'released on bail' in May 2024 and stops there, while the page's own listed sources report his later guilty plea, an attempt to withdraw it, a bail-breach jailing, and an eventual six-year prison sentence. That is a materially wrong account of a named, living person's current legal status, built from sources the page already cites. The review also found a UK FCA warning notice described as a regulatory 'ban' (claim_findings[4]), a Solidus Labs liquidity-collapse proxy presented as a proven finding of 'rug pulls or fraud' (claim_findings[7], [19]), stale revenue figures roughly 35% below current reporting (claim_findings[2]), and a court-order date off by two days from the page's own cited source (claim_findings[22]). No single item meets the bar for denial, but together they show a page that has not kept pace with its own sourcing and periodically overstates what its sources support, which warrants revision rather than a clean pass.","score_delta":-15,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}