Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
2 → 0 (-8)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443513191
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T10:04:57.051Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
9nFKv6gHzgW4BSFYxWPu8B68bSC3oBqYbB2tHSu5NCii
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1841 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T10:04:56.639Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"0cb466fb-b42c-498a-8146-c175847ac1d7","new_score":0,"page_slug":"christopher-delgado-goliath-ventures-inc","prev_score":2,"reason":"The review's disputed rate of 6.1% (2 of 33 claims) would ordinarily support approval, and the page's core narrative -- arrest, guilty plea, criminal charges, CFTC and SEC dollar figures, forfeited assets, and a quoted DOJ statement -- is strongly corroborated against primary sources at high reviewer confidence (claim_findings[1]-[13], [16]-[28], [30]-[31]). However, one disputed item is not a minor slip: the page states Delgado misappropriated funds for 'real estate, luxury vehicles, a yacht, travel, and gambling,' but the reviewer found the word 'gambling' appears nowhere in the SEC complaint or any independent reporting reviewed (claim_findings[19]) -- an unsupported addition of conduct detail about a named individual in an active criminal and regulatory matter, made harder to catch because it sits inside an otherwise accurate list. A second disputed item places the scheme's collapse in January 2026 when the page's own cited SEC complaint states the operational collapse and halted distributions occurred in November 2025 (claim_findings[32]). Two coverage gaps rated high priority compound this: an unreconciled roughly $2 million gap between CFTC and SEC yacht-purchase figures, and an unresolved conflict between the page's stated Apopka residence and the SEC's own August 2026 complaint naming Windermere. Together these require correction before the page can be considered fully settled, even though the great majority of the page holds up.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}