Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Cork V1
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 10 → 10 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465082912
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-03T23:25:57.540Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-03T23:26:26.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-03T23:26:26.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Es3L2qFdhiENMGyqhtJYPdFW9aG24Rtoo38dRFGyK81k
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1288 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"0eae4b321c053b65b977813af0431d13","decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:25:57.497Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"DykDTUQFuiXoLtfKfTmEUTQgUXhnASiGzgGpYXCRauwa","investigation_id":"d46de3f5-5b77-4b7f-bab5-692907d54b7d","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":10,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"b5d17ef3e09fbf6457356dcdd781bd65dd9b2d3c58171964d8fe87a1b6ed0eda","page_slug":"cork-v1","prev_score":10,"reason":"The core exploit facts (date, time, amount, wstETH to ETH conversion, Tornado Cash laundering, 10 ETH donation) hold. Problems: the claim that three auditors explicitly excluded CorkHook rests largely on Sherlock's contested account, one timeline entry merges events from different dates, and the page leaves out that most remaining user funds were withdrawn from the unaffected markets. Founder biographies and the funding round were not checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}