Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T14:06:58.001Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"06c78961-71f4-45b4-8c5c-095eeb41b058","new_score":0,"page_slug":"ravencoin-consensus-vulnerability-exploit-august-2026","prev_score":10,"reason":"The page's core narrative holds up well: the nHeight/KAWPOW consensus flaw, exploitation beginning at block 4,487,776, the 2Miners emergency patch, the exchange suspensions, and the price decline are all independently corroborated, and the review found no confusion with Ravencoin's separate 2018 or 2020 incidents. However, three problems are serious enough to require revision even though only 1 of 47 claims (about 2%) was directly disputed. First, the page reached a confident 'an attacker exploited' characterization without ever consulting the official Ravencoin GitHub release notes, which describe the initiating party as a self-described security researcher whose exploit was only disclosed after a separate party copied it -- a nuance that bears on attribution and intent and was flagged as a high-priority coverage gap (claim_findings[0], [11], [15]; coverage_gaps[0]). Second, the page attributes a 77% year-over-year price decline to CoinTrust, but the cited CoinTrust article contains no such figure at all -- an unsupported citation, regardless of its small share of total claims (claim_findings[30]). Third, an entire section arguing Ravencoin's core team is 'inactive' is now outdated: the same maintainer shipped an official combined fix crediting the community patch five days after the page's stated investigation date, and the page has not been updated to reflect it (claim_findings[32], [40], [46]; coverage_gaps[1]). Together these point to sourcing and currency problems in a page making pointed attribution and governance claims, warranting a modest score reduction and revision rather than approval as published.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}