Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 3 → 0 (-3)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462187372
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:22:01.066Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:22:33.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:22:33.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6mhpGCgpi33NgkHyyZjQLG44HK5HMYbRCfcxnoyG8Beu
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1998 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5aa7ee12d91471d6c81864d716f75c45","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:22:00.753Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3684,"investigation_id":"72717c3d-ca7a-4038-95d4-e982a78ca436","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"doj-scam-center-strike-force-southeast-asia-pig-butchering-network","prev_score":3,"reason":"Of 19 claim findings, 5 were disputed and 2 were unverifiable (not_found), giving a disputed share of about 37%, in the significant band. The disputed items include a reversed order of the Strike Force and the March 2026 Executive Order (claim_findings[2]), the September 2025 OFAC action dated 2024 (claim_findings[3]), and the Huione laundering period and rule publication date (claim_findings[4], [5], [6]). The headline restrained total of $725.9M is stale and not in the cited release (claim_findings[0], [1]), and the material omission of the $1B+ DOJ figure adds weight. The core enforcement narrative (April 23 and 29 actions, Kok An sanctions, Disruption Week, Operation Level Up) matched DOJ and Treasury sources, so the page is revised and not denied.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-3,"score_limit":{"applied":-3,"limited":true,"proposed":-22,"rule":"limited_no_second_opinion","second":null},"sequence_num":3,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The review reports a material omission and subject_status.contradicts_page: DOJ's current restrained total is about $1.006B, while the page presents $725.9M as the official figure in both the summary and a section. This agrees with the significant band implied by the percentage and keeps the page at that band, not approve or minor."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}