Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Mining Automatic / Zan Shaikh
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 461977481
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T06:58:16.725Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T06:58:36.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T06:58:36.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- DiCqztNcprzcQtZh2gLZJMBN5bm7k5JTZFVGcA2RXfdi
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1341 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"bbbeb3c0c0c886a7fbc012cc4b1df5aa","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:58:16.476Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0909,"findings_hash":"NF5Q1ra9SsjhmZsJP6Ph1tqjwktDntrfdDKrqLj6tqC","investigation_id":"a7f98568-8646-4556-82fb-4a735f303028","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"54e81a2a4583955101ed3d6ac0649953786ff84297112e6042e3879d123b0690","page_slug":"mining-automatic-zan-shaikh","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core SEC facts (date, court, charges, $22M, 380+ investors, 13% to mining, $1.1M revenue vs $1.8M paid, itemized spending, consent terms, age and residence) all match the SEC release and complaint. Weak points are unsourced associations (Hassan Shaikh, officer titles, other business entities) and calling a recovery-service promoter 'independent'. The FBI page could not be fetched. The latest status after July 2026 was not established.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}