Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T07:25:57.713Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"5087a9e8-fd5e-4a03-bda7-7972b43a30c8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"darwin-labs-private-limited","prev_score":4,"reason":"The page's factual reporting holds up well: 40 of 48 claims were independently confirmed, including word-for-word verification of direct quotations and a direct match against corporate registry data, and only 1 claim (8.3%) was found disputed — well within the approve range on numbers alone. However, the review identified two high-priority coverage gaps that go to the current legal status of the three named individuals at the center of the page's criminal allegations: it omits that Ayush Varshney was granted bail on April 7, 2026 with the court explicitly finding 'no iota of evidence' he induced or received money from any investor (claim_findings[33], marked stale), and it never addresses that co-founders Baghla and Jain were released on High Court bail years ago or that no charge sheet has been filed against any of the three men (coverage_gaps[0] and coverage_gaps[1], both priority: high). A related timeline entry (claim_findings[36]) is disputed on its date and compounds the same omission. None of this undermines the underlying CBI allegations themselves, which remain independently corroborated — the issue is that the page reads as if the men remain in unresolved custody when more recent, exculpatory developments exist and are missing. That combination — a judicial finding of no evidence, on a page naming three living individuals in connection with active criminal charges — is serious enough to require revision before republication, even though the low disputed_pct alone would not have triggered it.","score_delta":-14,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}