Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · BlockFills / Reliz Technology Group
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
12 → 12 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443515948
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T18:17:25.868Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
HUVgfetaW1QGyibxvbgNC7kxM8jvfASZ2ZxSMeGp8ByS
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1099 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T18:17:25.615Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"a40409a6-9de6-46ce-98c4-986fc81c21c0","new_score":12,"page_slug":"blockfills-reliz-technology-group","prev_score":12,"reason":"The page's core narrative — the Reliz Technology Group Holdings/BlockFills corporate relationship, the Dominion Capital lawsuit and its allegations, the federal asset freeze, the Chapter 11 filing, and the Keyrock acquisition — is well supported by primary and reputable secondary sources and is checked against multiple independent outlets. The main weaknesses found are a handful of citation-attribution mismatches (specific figures or names not actually present in the sources cited in that section, though verifiable elsewhere), an unreconciled aggregate loss figure ($75-80M) versus the itemized bankruptcy-filing breakdown, and a few investor names in the funding section that could not be traced to the cited press release.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}