Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · YOLO Games
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 52 → 52 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464366155
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:46:48.716Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:47:18.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:47:18.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FiuLHrNx1G3a9PrMtyik2Abrc2y3ftZrF6NZCGpbXA6K
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1324 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"bc5e63c9a7ac687185f8d5d00bee7532","decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:46:48.666Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1,"findings_hash":"APcgv6VeefVVnm64JHHxZhfpkEBWiYfyui3aNPsS2YeE","investigation_id":"1945cdd8-cb90-4ba0-a8cc-880c304f674f","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":52,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"9b01b97d7dd320625a6623ff7689bb540ebdc87d4c2fc79db1f8c52c502a12ea","page_slug":"yolo-games","prev_score":52,"reason":"The core exploit narrative, with its amounts, addresses, dates and 90% return, matches CertiK. The token decline and fee collapse are confirmed in direction. The all-time-low figure is stale because CoinGecko now shows a lower ATL, and the LooksRare 'core contributor' and '2.5% of initial supply' wording is not directly supported. No shutdown, sanction or new exploit was found. Several secondary sources (Cantina, Messari, X) were not fetched, so those claims are unchecked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}